{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0006.txt","chunk_index":6,"documents_referenced":["協調會公文","起訴書"],"end_seconds":2070,"keywords":["京華城案","公文禮儀","密會","對價關係","無給職顧問"],"legal_issues":["質疑起訴書之證據充足性及辦案程序之公正性","關於聘僱無給職顧問是否涉及違法或具有對價關係之爭議","關於與公務員（黃景茂）是否存在非法密會之指控"],"legal_issues_raw":["關於聘僱無給職顧問是否涉及違法或具有對價關係之爭議","關於與公務員（黃景茂）是否存在非法密會之指控","質疑起訴書之證據充足性及辦案程序之公正性"],"participants":["吳順民（無給職顧問）","林俊言","檢察官","議員","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["被告（議員）","吳順民（無給職顧問）","黃景茂","檢察官","林俊言"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0006","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":1770,"summary":"被告針對起訴書內容進行辯護，否認與黃局長有密會之實，澄清吳順民之身分僅為無給職顧問而非助理，且其領取其他公司勞務費與擔任顧問不衝突。被告質疑檢方證據不足，指控其辦案方式受特定人士影響且缺乏事實根據，請求檢察官回歸正序辦案。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0006.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0006.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0006","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0006/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0006/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0006/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}