{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0010.txt","chunk_index":10,"documents_referenced":["偵查筆錄","審理紀錄"],"end_seconds":3250,"keywords":["主導權","容積獎勵","證據能力","證詞矛盾","金華成案"],"legal_issues":["應曉薇是否主導金華成案之容積獎勵核定","柯文哲與應曉薇之間是否存在針對金華成案的私下聯絡","證人證詞之證據能力與可信度（偵查與審理之證詞矛盾）"],"legal_issues_raw":["證人證詞之證據能力與可信度（偵查與審理之證詞矛盾）","應曉薇是否主導金華成案之容積獎勵核定","柯文哲與應曉薇之間是否存在針對金華成案的私下聯絡"],"participants":["應曉薇","朱亞虎","柯文哲","辯護律師（發言者）","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","朱亞虎（證人）","邵琇珮（證人）","應曉薇（被告/相關人）","柯文哲（被告/相關人）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0010","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":2950,"summary":"辯方針對證人朱亞虎與邵琇珮在偵查階段與審理階段之證詞不一致進行質疑。重點在於朱亞虎關於應曉薇主導金華成案、與柯文哲聯絡之說法，在審理中均承認僅為個人猜測，並無親眼目睹或確切證據，且承認市議員並無容積獎勵之決定權。此外，亦提及邵琇珮在偵查中對柯文哲、應曉薇與金華成間聯絡暢通之證詞，並於審理中進行求證。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0010.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0010.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0010","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0010/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0010/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0010/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}