{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0011.txt","chunk_index":11,"documents_referenced":["106年6月6日市議會質詢逐字譯文","監察院102年調查報告及105年糾正文","起訴書"],"end_seconds":3545,"keywords":["協調會","容積率","市議員職權","監督市政","證據能力","京華城案"],"legal_issues":["市議員職務權限之界定（質詢、協調會、便當會、索取資料是否構成違背職務之施壓）","應曉薇之質詢內容是否構成對公務員之強要或施壓","證人證言之證據能力與證明力（關於應曉薇與柯文哲之聯絡）"],"legal_issues_raw":["證人證言之證據能力與證明力（關於應曉薇與柯文哲之聯絡）","市議員職務權限之界定（質詢、協調會、便當會、索取資料是否構成違背職務之施壓）","應曉薇之質詢內容是否構成對公務員之強要或施壓"],"participants":["彭振聲","應曉薇","朱亞虎","柯文哲","苗博雅","邵琇珮","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["應曉薇","柯文哲","邵琇珮","黃景茂","朱亞虎","苗博雅","彭振聲"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0011","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":3245,"summary":"本段內容為辯方針對應曉薇涉嫌違背職務之行為進行辯護。首先指出證人邵琇珮關於應曉薇與柯文哲聯絡之證詞僅為猜測，缺乏證據能力。其次，針對檢方指控應曉薇利用質詢、協調會、便當會及索取資料等行為施壓市府，辯方引用證人（朱亞虎、苗博雅）之證言，主張該等行為均屬市議員正常職務範圍內之陳情與監督。最後，針對106年6月6日之質詢紀錄，辯方主張應曉薇僅是要求市府釐清容積率，而非強要特定容積率，且市府在此之前已決定處理方式。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0011.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0011.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0011","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0011/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0011/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0011/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}