{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0012.txt","chunk_index":12,"documents_referenced":["106年5月3日市府會議結論","107年6月22日、6月29日、7月16日京華城公司陳情信","法院證人證述（林欽榮、林中明、吳順民）","都發局109年2月24日簽審文件"],"end_seconds":3840,"keywords":["京華城案","公訴意旨","容積率","施壓","樓地板面積","行政處分"],"legal_issues":["公訴書所述之事實是否與證人證詞及書面證據相悖","是否利用市議員職權對公務員施壓以圖利京華城公司","是否違背職務要求市府恢復京華城特定樓地板面積（120,284平方公尺）"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否利用市議員職權對公務員施壓以圖利京華城公司","是否違背職務要求市府恢復京華城特定樓地板面積（120,284平方公尺）","公訴書所述之事實是否與證人證詞及書面證據相悖"],"participants":["吳順民","彭振聲","應曉薇","林中明","林欽榮","柯文哲","沈慶京","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["應曉薇","柯文哲","林欽榮","林中明","沈慶京","吳順民","彭振聲","黃景茂"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0012","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":3540,"summary":"辯方針對公訴書中關於應曉薇議員涉嫌施壓市府恢復京華城容積率之指控進行反駁。重點在於：1. 106年6月的行政處分決定係基於市府既有結論而非應曉薇要求；2. 107年的三次協調會係針對土地使用性質限制之陳情，與恢復120,284平方公尺樓地板面積無關，且無施壓行為；3. 109年2月18日的拜會中，沈慶京並未同行，公訴書所述事實與偵查紀錄及簽審文件不符。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0012.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0012.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0012","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0012/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0012/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0012/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}