{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0013.txt","chunk_index":13,"documents_referenced":["彭振聲偵查詢問筆錄","臺北市府都發局受理人民陳情案件涉及都市計畫或土管規定案件的辦理說明","都發局109年4月6日簽呈","京華城公司陳情信"],"end_seconds":4135,"keywords":["京華城","容積率","施壓","研議","都委會","都發局","陳情"],"legal_issues":["將京華城陳情案送交都委會研議是否違法","應曉薇之行為是否構成違背職務或要求公務員「放水」","應曉薇是否利用職務之便對公務員施壓或不當干預行政裁量"],"legal_issues_raw":["應曉薇是否利用職務之便對公務員施壓或不當干預行政裁量","將京華城陳情案送交都委會研議是否違法","應曉薇之行為是否構成違背職務或要求公務員「放水」"],"participants":["吳順民","彭振聲","應曉薇","柯文哲","楊志勝","陳俊源","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["應曉薇","吳順民","彭振聲","黃景茂","陳俊源","柯文哲","楊志勝"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0013","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":3835,"summary":"本段文字主要論述應曉薇在京華城容積率爭議案中，並未對彭振聲、黃景茂等公務員施壓或違法干預。辯方主張應曉薇代轉陳情信及建議送交都委會研議之行為符合都發局處理規範，且多位證人（含柯文哲市長）均證稱其無不當施壓或脅迫之情事，並澄清先前關於「放水」之說法為偵查筆錄之臆測。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0013.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0013.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0013","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0013/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0013/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0013/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}