{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0016.txt","chunk_index":16,"documents_referenced":["偵查筆錄（錄音錄影逐字稿）","專案小組會議逐字稿","都市計畫法第24條","都發局109年6月20日第一次專案小組會議簡報"],"end_seconds":5020,"keywords":["京華城","容積獎勵","專案小組","施壓","自提細部計畫","行政指導","都市計畫法第24條"],"legal_issues":["是否共同施壓都發局導致不法回復樓地板面積","是否違反公務員職權或涉嫌圖利","行政指導之合法性與必要性"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否共同施壓都發局導致不法回復樓地板面積","行政指導之合法性與必要性","是否違反公務員職權或涉嫌圖利"],"participants":["劉玉山","劉秀玲","吳順民","應曉薇","檢察官","白仁德","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["應曉薇","吳順民","邵琇珮","劉玉山","白仁德","劉秀玲","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0016","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":4720,"summary":"本段文字針對京華城案中，關於應曉薇與吳順民是否施壓都發局導致不法回復樓地板面積之指控進行辯護。內容強調都發局在專案小組會議前已建議可依《都市計畫法》第24條申請容積獎勵，且邵琇珮等委員之建議係基於專業判斷與法規彈性，而非受應曉薇指示或壓力。同時說明應曉薇召開協調會並指派邵琇珮、劉秀玲參與，係屬行政指導之合理安排，且邵琇珮在偵查筆錄中明確否認受到壓力。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0016.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0016.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0016","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0016/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0016/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0016/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}