{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0017.txt","chunk_index":17,"documents_referenced":["109年8月19日第一版細部計畫案","109年9月11日容積獎勵公展簽辦公文","109年9月21日關於補充私法性、公益性、貢獻度之公文","公訴書"],"end_seconds":5315,"keywords":["京華城案","協調會","容積獎勵","施壓","細部計畫","都發局"],"legal_issues":["公訴書指控之事實與證人證詞是否相符","是否涉嫌施壓公務員以影響京華城案之行政處分","是否涉嫌請託違背職務"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否涉嫌施壓公務員以影響京華城案之行政處分","是否涉嫌請託違背職務","公訴書指控之事實與證人證詞是否相符"],"participants":["應曉薇","吳順民","少秀配","張家琪","林之宇","陳行人","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["應曉薇","陳行人","少秀配","吳順民","林之宇","黃景茂","張家琪"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0017","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5015,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要針對應曉薇是否在京華城案中對都發局公務員施壓進行辯論。內容引用少秀配、吳順民、林之宇及黃景茂等人的證詞，強調應曉薇在協調會中僅是以客觀方式主持，且公務員林之宇與黃景茂均否認受到應曉薇的施壓、責罵或要求特定結果，旨在反駁公訴書中關於應曉薇施壓公務員以違背職務之指控。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0017.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0017.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0017","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0017/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0017/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0017/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}