{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0020.txt","chunk_index":20,"documents_referenced":["107年11月至112年10月索資紀錄表格","109年12月24日之相關紀錄","109年7月6日之索資請求（654次會議錄音資料）","775次會議書面意見","783次會議書面意見"],"end_seconds":6200,"keywords":["不當施壓","京華城案","容積率","索資","行政裁量","議員監督","都委會"],"legal_issues":["公訴方關於「大量索資作為施壓手段」之指控是否成立","索取行政資料是否導致公務員在撰寫書面意見時違背職務忠實義務","議員行使監督權是否構成對公務員的不當施壓"],"legal_issues_raw":["議員行使監督權是否構成對公務員的不當施壓","索取行政資料是否導致公務員在撰寫書面意見時違背職務忠實義務","公訴方關於「大量索資作為施壓手段」之指控是否成立"],"participants":["劉秀玲","應曉薇","林亮君","苗博雅","蔡立瑞","許巧新","許淑華","辯方律師/"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師/發言人","蔡立瑞（都委會府會聯絡人）","劉秀玲（都委會人員）","應曉薇（議員）","許巧新（議員）","林亮君（議員）","苗博雅（議員）","許淑華（議員）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0020","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5900,"summary":"辯方針對應曉薇議員是否透過大量索資手段對都委會公務員（蔡立瑞、劉秀玲）施壓，影響其撰寫書面意見之公正性進行辯論。辯方主張索資屬議員監督之常態，且相關索資時間點與爭議會議時序不符，且相關公務員均證稱未受壓力或指導，否認公訴方關於「施壓」之指控。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0020.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0020.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0020","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0020/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0020/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0020/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}