{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0022.txt","chunk_index":22,"documents_referenced":["偵查筆錄","會議記錄","證詞錄音"],"end_seconds":6790,"keywords":["PM制度","京華城案","便當會","偵查筆錄","濫用職權","行政中立"],"legal_issues":["偵查筆錄之記載是否與證人實際陳述相符（證據可靠性）","是否涉嫌濫用職權或施壓公務員（破壞行政中立）","議員提出市政意見是否屬於合理職權範圍"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否涉嫌濫用職權或施壓公務員（破壞行政中立）","偵查筆錄之記載是否與證人實際陳述相符（證據可靠性）","議員提出市政意見是否屬於合理職權範圍"],"participants":["張莉莉","應曉薇","柯文哲","檢察官","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["應曉薇","張莉莉","柯文哲","邵琇珮","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0022","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":6490,"summary":"本段文字主要針對應曉薇是否在京華城案中施壓公務員及濫用職權進行辯護。內容包含張莉莉證稱應曉薇未曾要求護航或施壓；說明柯文哲政府設定 PM（專案經理）制度為行政文化而非針對京華城個案；以及質疑邵琇珮關於「告狀」之證詞與錄音不符，並強調便當會討論內容涵蓋多項市政議題，屬一般政策交流。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0022.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0022.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0022","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0022/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0022/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0022/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}