{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0024.txt","chunk_index":24,"documents_referenced":["106年6月6日質詢紀錄","公訴書","歷次協調會及便當會會議紀錄","都發局電子公文","都發會第765次會議紀錄"],"end_seconds":7380,"keywords":["京華城","傳聞證據","對價關係","濫權","行受賄","行政中立","議員監督權"],"legal_issues":["是否構成濫用職權（- 施壓公務員或干預行政處分）","是否構成行受賄（- 探討與沈慶京之間是否存在對價關係）","證詞之證據能力（傳聞證據之爭議）","議員行使監督權之合法性範圍"],"legal_issues_raw":["證詞之證據能力（傳聞證據之爭議）","是否構成濫用職權（- 施壓公務員或干預行政處分）","是否構成行受賄（- 探討與沈慶京之間是否存在對價關係）","議員行使監督權之合法性範圍"],"participants":["劉秀玲","張立麗","彭振聲","應曉薇","於雪紅","李敏衛","柯文哲","楊志勝","沈慶京","王金棠","胡芳瓊","邵琇珮","郭太奇","魯寶珍","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["應曉薇","劉秀玲","王金棠","李敏衛","彭振聲","黃景茂","邵琇珮","楊志勝","胡芳瓊","張立麗","郭太奇","柯文哲","沈慶京","魯寶珍","於雪紅"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0024","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":7080,"summary":"本段文字為辯方針對應曉薇議員之陳述，主張其在京華城案中之行為屬於行使議員監督職權，並非濫權或施壓。辯方質疑劉秀玲之證詞為傳聞且與事實不符，並強調多位公務員及前市長柯文哲之證詞均顯示應曉薇態度平和，無施壓情事。此外，針對行賄指控，辯方說明應曉薇與沈慶京之關係係源於共同的命理學習與志工活動，並無對價關係。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0024.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0024.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0024","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0024/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0024/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0024/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}