{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0026.txt","chunk_index":26,"documents_referenced":["公訴方提交之對話記錄（包含陳嘉敏與王尊凱之對話）","證人證詞（朱亞虎、陳嘉敏、王尊凱）"],"end_seconds":7970,"keywords":["協會財務","城市發展促進會","實際負責人","斷章取義","格鬥協會","虛設社團"],"legal_issues":["公訴方提出之對話紀錄是否具備完整性與證明力","應曉薇是否為協會之實際負責人或具有財務支配權","相關協會（城市發展促進會、格鬥協會）是否為虛設社團"],"legal_issues_raw":["應曉薇是否為協會之實際負責人或具有財務支配權","公訴方提出之對話紀錄是否具備完整性與證明力","相關協會（城市發展促進會、格鬥協會）是否為虛設社團"],"participants":["應曉薇","朱亞虎","王尊凱","陳俊源","陳嘉敏","餘雪紅"],"participants_raw":["應曉薇","陳嘉敏","朱亞虎","陳俊源","王尊凱","餘雪紅"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0026","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":7670,"summary":"辯方針對應曉薇是否掌控協會財務及實際負責人身分進行辯護。針對公訴方主張應曉薇支配協會資金之說，辯方指出相關對話被斷章取義，且缺乏證據證明其支配權。同時說明「城市發展促進會」及三個「格鬥協會」的成立目的與實際運作情況，強調城市發展促進會由王尊凱負責，而格鬥協會則是為解決競技運動體系困境而成立，並非虛設。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0026.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0026.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0026","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0026/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0026/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0026/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}