{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0027.txt","chunk_index":27,"documents_referenced":["會計師查核報告書","體育局補助表"],"end_seconds":8265,"keywords":["京華城案","對價關係","收受賄賂","空殼組織","綜合格鬥","財務決策權"],"legal_issues":["協會是否為虛設之空殼組織","收受賄賂罪之構成要件（行賄意思與對價關係之合意）","財務印鑑保管與實際財務決策權之區分","透過協會迂迴交付賄賂之認定"],"legal_issues_raw":["協會是否為虛設之空殼組織","財務印鑑保管與實際財務決策權之區分","收受賄賂罪之構成要件（行賄意思與對價關係之合意）","透過協會迂迴交付賄賂之認定"],"participants":["劉潔豪","吳順民","應曉薇","王尊凱","省清清","陳嘉明"],"participants_raw":["王尊凱","應曉薇","陳嘉明","劉潔豪","省清清","吳順民"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0027","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":7965,"summary":"本段文字主要針對多個格鬥協會的運作實質性、財務管理權限以及涉嫌賄賂之指控進行辯護。辯方主張協會透過舉辦大型賽事及國際接軌證明其非虛設組織；關於財務印鑑由陳嘉明保管之事實，係為行政便利，不代表應曉薇擁有決策權；並針對公訴方指稱協會為空殼組織及省清清透過協會迂迴交付賄賂予應曉薇之指控提出反駁，強調收受賄賂需具備行賄意思與對價關係之合意。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0027.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0027.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0027","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0027/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0027/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0027/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}