{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0029.txt","chunk_index":29,"documents_referenced":["中華工程董事會決議/預算編列紀錄","沈慶京書狀","請款單","京華城110年11月10日減資與盈餘分配紀錄","京華城第十屆第五次臨時董事會會議紀錄"],"end_seconds":8855,"keywords":["京華城案","公益捐助","容積獎勵","對價關係","減資盈餘分配","行賄"],"legal_issues":["捐款之性質（例行公益捐助 vs. 賄賂）","捐款行為是否構成行賄之對價關係","是否涉及濫用議員權利介入行政權以獲取容積獎勵之不法利益","資金來源與捐款時點之因果關係"],"legal_issues_raw":["捐款行為是否構成行賄之對價關係","捐款之性質（例行公益捐助 vs. 賄賂）","資金來源與捐款時點之因果關係","是否涉及濫用議員權利介入行政權以獲取容積獎勵之不法利益"],"participants":["吳順民","應曉薇","沈慶京","辯方律師"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師","沈慶京","應曉薇","吳順民"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0029","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":8555,"summary":"辯方針對京華城案之賄賂指控進行辯護，主張中華工程對華夏光懷協會的捐款屬於公司制度化之例行公益捐助，並非與應曉薇之職務行為有對價關係。同時說明沈慶京於110年11月之捐款，係在京華城土地標售收到尾款並辦理減資分配後，才具備財務能力履行早前之公益承諾，而非行賄。此外，針對1.86億元之董事會決議，辯方主張該款項為顧問報酬，與前述捐款資金來源不同。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0029.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0029.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0029","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0029/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0029/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0029/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}