{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0031.txt","chunk_index":31,"documents_referenced":["應曉薇之證述","沈慶京之證述"],"end_seconds":9445,"keywords":["公益協會","對價關係","捐款","行賄","賄賂罪"],"legal_issues":["捐款行為是否構成行賄之證據","行賄之主觀犯意認定","賄賂罪之對價關係與意思表示合致"],"legal_issues_raw":["行賄之主觀犯意認定","賄賂罪之對價關係與意思表示合致","捐款行為是否構成行賄之證據"],"participants":["應曉薇","沈慶京","王尊凱","餘雪紅"],"participants_raw":["沈慶京","應曉薇","餘雪紅","王尊凱"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0031","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":9145,"summary":"本段文字為辯方針對沈慶京捐款行為之辯護，主張沈慶京捐款給五個協會（總額四千五百萬元）係基於對餘雪紅生前倡議之履行及公益目的，而非行賄應曉薇。辯方強調捐款金額之分配是基於公益價值排序，且交付過程係因餘雪紅之介紹而產生的信賴關係。同時主張應曉薇並無索求利益之事實，且雙方之間不存在對價關係或行賄之意思表示合致，因此不構成賄賂罪。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0031.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0031.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0031","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0031/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0031/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0031/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}