{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0032.txt","chunk_index":32,"documents_referenced":["中公保全公司簽呈、轉帳傳票、匯款申請單","中情人力公司簽呈、轉帳傳票、匯款申請單","中華工程公司簽呈、轉帳傳票、匯款申請單","政治獻金申報紀錄"],"end_seconds":9740,"keywords":["公益捐贈","對價關係","市議員職權","政治獻金","經驗法則","賄賂"],"legal_issues":["捐款性質之認定（公益捐贈 vs. 行賄）","捐款行為與職務行為之間是否存在對價關係","政治獻金之合法性與申報程序","是否構成行賄或收賄之主觀認識（故意）"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否構成行賄或收賄之主觀認識（故意）","捐款行為與職務行為之間是否存在對價關係","捐款性質之認定（公益捐贈 vs. 行賄）","政治獻金之合法性與申報程序"],"participants":["應曉薇","沈慶京","辯護律師（發言者）"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","應曉薇（被告/當事人）","沈慶京（相關人）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0032","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":9440,"summary":"辯方針對應曉薇是否收受沈慶京賄賂之指控進行辯護。主張京華城減資與捐款之時間點使被告無法預見，且捐款採取公開入帳之方式與行賄之隱密性相悖。同時強調應曉薇作為市議員僅有監督權而無行政裁量權，捐款金額與其職權不符，應屬公益捐贈或合法政治獻金，而非職務對價。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0032.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0032.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0032","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0032/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0032/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0032/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}