{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0033.txt","chunk_index":33,"documents_referenced":[],"end_seconds":10035,"keywords":["公益承諾","對價關係","政治獻金","職務行為","賄賂"],"legal_issues":["公益捐款是否具有主觀受賄意圖","政治獻金是否構成賄賂之對價關係","職務行為與金錢給付之間是否存在對價關係"],"legal_issues_raw":["政治獻金是否構成賄賂之對價關係","公益捐款是否具有主觀受賄意圖","職務行為與金錢給付之間是否存在對價關係"],"participants":["應曉薇","沈慶京","秦惠珠","辯護律師（發言者）"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","應曉薇","沈慶京","秦惠珠"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0033","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":9735,"summary":"辯方主張政治獻金之捐贈屬於常態性的企業政治參與，並非針對特定公務行為的對價交換；同時強調沈慶京捐贈給五個協會的4,500萬元係履行公益承諾，應曉薇對該款項之運作不知情且無主觀受賄意圖，兩者間不存在職務行為的對價關係，故不構成賄賂罪。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0033.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0033.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0033","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0033/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0033/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0033/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}