{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0004.txt","chunk_index":4,"documents_referenced":[],"end_seconds":1480,"keywords":["偽證","先射箭後畫靶","行政誤任","詐騙","都委會","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["是否涉嫌偽證（林清榮於監察院作證之內容）","檢察官調查程序之公正性（指控先射箭後畫靶）","行政程序錯誤之認定（行政誤任或詐騙）","都市計畫報請都委會之合法性與程序"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否涉嫌偽證（林清榮於監察院作證之內容）","行政程序錯誤之認定（行政誤任或詐騙）","檢察官調查程序之公正性（指控先射箭後畫靶）","都市計畫報請都委會之合法性與程序"],"participants":["審判長及","林周敏","林清榮","柯四虎","柯文哲","檢察官","發言者","蔡茂穎（台大教授）"],"participants_raw":["發言者","柯文哲（柯柯文哲）","林清榮（前副柯文哲）","柯四虎","林周敏（都市發展局長）","蔡茂穎（台大教授）","檢察官","審判長及法官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0004","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":1180,"summary":"發言者指控林清榮（前副市長）多次欺騙柯文哲市長，涉及金額認定（392萬與560萬之爭）以及都市計畫報請都委會之程序問題。發言者同時批評檢察官在調查過程中採取「先射箭後畫靶」的方式，僅詢問林清榮而未深入調查相關邏輯連結（如蔡茂穎），並指稱林清榮在106年6月改變證詞。","video_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","raw_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/raw/chunk_0004.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/cleaned/chunk_0004.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0004","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0004/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0004/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0004/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/sO8SNz7mXis","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}