{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0007.txt","chunk_index":7,"documents_referenced":["都市計畫主要計畫","都市計畫細部計畫審議原則","都市計畫細部計畫（公展文件）"],"end_seconds":2365,"keywords":["京華城","公展","林欽榮","樓地板面積","法律保留原則","細部計畫","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["行政行為是否構成違法沒收財產權","違反「都市計畫細部計畫審議原則」","違反憲法「法律保留原則」","都市計畫變更程序之合法性（主要計畫與細部計畫之上下位關係）"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市計畫變更程序之合法性（主要計畫與細部計畫之上下位關係）","違反「都市計畫細部計畫審議原則」","違反憲法「法律保留原則」","行政行為是否構成違法沒收財產權"],"participants":["審判長","法官","發言者（京華城顧問/集團大家長）"],"participants_raw":["發言者（京華城顧問/集團大家長）","審判長","法官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0007","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2065,"summary":"發言者指控林欽榮利用其都市計畫專業，在106年都委會討論前，於細部計畫公展過程中擅自刪除京華城受保障的120,284平方公尺樓地板面積，並以「配合國防及經濟發展」為不實理由掩蓋。發言者主張此舉違反「都市計畫細部計畫審議原則」及憲法「法律保留原則」，且未變更主要計畫即逕行變更細部計畫，導致京華城股東受損，認為這是後續所有爭議與指控的犯罪根源。","video_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","raw_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/raw/chunk_0007.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/cleaned/chunk_0007.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0007","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0007/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0007/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0007/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/sO8SNz7mXis","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}