{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0009.txt","chunk_index":9,"documents_referenced":["都市計畫法第24條"],"end_seconds":2955,"keywords":["京華城","圖利","容積獎勵","柯文哲","變形","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["20%容積獎勵之合法性（都市計畫法第24條）","利益計算之認定（是否應扣除土地、建築及管理成本）","是否構成圖利罪","與柯文哲之會面是否構成密謀","關於「變形」獎勵之定義爭議"],"legal_issues_raw":["20%容積獎勵之合法性（都市計畫法第24條）","是否構成圖利罪","關於「變形」獎勵之定義爭議","利益計算之認定（是否應扣除土地、建築及管理成本）","與柯文哲之會面是否構成密謀"],"participants":["林清榮","柯文哲","檢察官","發言者"],"participants_raw":["被告（發言者）","柯文哲（被提及）","林清榮（被提及之林副柯文哲）","檢察官（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0009","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2655,"summary":"被告針對京華城案之容積獎勵、圖利指控及與柯文哲之關係進行辯解。主張20%容積獎勵係依據都市計畫法第24條之合法規範，批評檢察官計算利益時未扣除成本且將其定義為「變形」之說法不合理；並否認與柯文哲於2月20日的會面為密謀，僅為一般交情之發牢騷，且認為柯文哲對該案細節並不清楚，並無侵害他人權益之意圖。","video_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","raw_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/raw/chunk_0009.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/cleaned/chunk_0009.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0009","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0009/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0009/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0009/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/sO8SNz7mXis","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}