{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0024.txt","chunk_index":24,"documents_referenced":["案卷（提及林俊廷檢察官之相關紀錄）","被告提交之文字稿（擬作為筆錄附件）"],"end_seconds":7380,"keywords":["京華城案","司法獨立","政治案件","羈押","辯護陳述"],"legal_issues":["司法獨立與政治干預之爭議","被告在羈押期間之處遇與人權保障","起訴動機之單純性（刑事案件 vs. 政治案件）"],"legal_issues_raw":["司法獨立與政治干預之爭議","起訴動機之單純性（刑事案件 vs. 政治案件）","被告在羈押期間之處遇與人權保障"],"participants":["審判長","廖維治律師（辯護人）","未具名（書記官）","沈慶京"],"participants_raw":["沈慶京（被告）","廖維治律師（辯護人）","審判長（法官）","未具名（書記官）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0024","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":7080,"summary":"本段逐字稿記錄了被告沈慶京及其辯護人廖維治律師在法庭上的陳述。被告表達對司法公正及政治壓力的擔憂，並請求將其文字稿作為附件併入筆錄。隨後，辯護人廖律師針對本案（京華城案）提出辯論，主張本案具有政治色彩，並將其視為檢驗台灣司法獨立與法治程度的試金石，質疑起訴動機是否單純，並提及被告沈慶京在羈押期間的身體狀況與受處遇情形。","video_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","raw_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/raw/chunk_0024.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/cleaned/chunk_0024.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0024","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0024/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0024/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0024/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/sO8SNz7mXis","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}