{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0025.txt","chunk_index":25,"documents_referenced":["內部辦案進行單","林俊言檢察官之行文（醫院訊問通知）","訊問筆錄"],"end_seconds":7675,"keywords":["刑事訴訟法","北檢","密室逼供","緘默權","視察","錄音錄影"],"legal_issues":["公務員（檢察官）是否於法庭上公然說謊或誤導","密室逼供之爭議","檢察官是否濫用職權威脅被告","違反刑事訴訟法第101條之1（關於訊問之錄音錄影規定）"],"legal_issues_raw":["密室逼供之爭議","違反刑事訴訟法第101條之1（關於訊問之錄音錄影規定）","檢察官是否濫用職權威脅被告","公務員（檢察官）是否於法庭上公然說謊或誤導"],"participants":["廖彥均","林俊言","沈經經","沈經經之室友","法務部相關長官","辯方律師（發言者）"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師（發言者）","林俊言（檢察官）","沈經經（被告）","廖彥均（檢察官）","法務部相關長官","沈經經之室友"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0025","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":7375,"summary":"辯方律師質疑北檢檢察官林俊言於113年10月11日在醫院對重病住院的被告沈經經進行「密室逼供」。律師指出，林俊言雖以訊問名義行文，但實際筆錄僅3分鐘且被告行使緘默權，質疑其真實目的是透過威脅（提及柯文哲及公司財團）逼供，且全程未錄音錄影，違反刑事訴訟法。針對北檢及檢察官廖彥均辯稱該行為是「視察」且由被告主動要求筆錄之說法，律師認為此為公然說謊且包庇同僚。","video_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","raw_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/raw/chunk_0025.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/cleaned/chunk_0025.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0025","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0025/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0025/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0025/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/sO8SNz7mXis","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}