{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0029.txt","chunk_index":29,"documents_referenced":["協議書","起訴書","都市計畫法第24條"],"end_seconds":8855,"keywords":["圖利罪","政治獻金","柯文哲","沈慶京","結果犯","農地獎勵","金華神公司","頂月公司"],"legal_issues":["圖利罪之成立要件（是否實際獲有利益，以及結果犯之認定）","圖利罪之未遂處罰規定（第四款不罰未遂）","行賄款項之認定（政治獻金專戶之性質與收賄邏輯之矛盾）"],"legal_issues_raw":["圖利罪之成立要件（是否實際獲有利益，以及結果犯之認定）","圖利罪之未遂處罰規定（第四款不罰未遂）","行賄款項之認定（政治獻金專戶之性質與收賄邏輯之矛盾）"],"participants":["檢察官","法官(三位)","辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","法官 (三位)","檢察官 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0029","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":8555,"summary":"辯護律師針對金華神公司與頂月公司涉嫌之圖利罪及行賄指控進行辯論。律師主張，根據協議書，公司需達成特定條件（如取得鑽石級標章）才可獲取農地獎勵金，但實際上因土地被扣押且停工，公司並未獲得任何利益，依據圖利罪之結果犯性質及不罰未遂之規定，不應成立犯罪。此外，針對210萬元匯款，律師質疑款項匯入民眾黨政治獻金專戶之合理性，認為政治人物不會使用需申報且公開的專戶收受賄款。","video_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","raw_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/raw/chunk_0029.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/cleaned/chunk_0029.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0029","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0029/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0029/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0029/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/sO8SNz7mXis","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}