{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0034.txt","chunk_index":34,"documents_referenced":["107年政治獻金紀錄","110年政治獻金紀錄","吳順民之名片","報稅紀錄"],"end_seconds":10330,"keywords":["公益協會","吳順民","威京集團","應惠中","收賄","政治獻金","行賄","顧問報酬"],"legal_issues":["助理與顧問之身分認定及其領薪之合法性","協會之真實性（幽靈協會之爭議）","行賄與收賄之認定（區分捐款、政治獻金與賄賂）","證據充足性（對比其他收賄案件之證據標準）"],"legal_issues_raw":["行賄與收賄之認定（區分捐款、政治獻金與賄賂）","協會之真實性（幽靈協會之爭議）","助理與顧問之身分認定及其領薪之合法性","證據充足性（對比其他收賄案件之證據標準）"],"participants":["吳順民","應惠中","於雪侯","檢察官","沈慶京/威京集團","賴素吾","辯護律師（發言者）"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","應惠中（被提及）","吳順民（被提及）","沈慶京/威京集團（被提及）","於雪侯（被提及）","檢察官（被提及）","賴素吾（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0034","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":10030,"summary":"辯方針對應惠中、吳順民及威京集團涉嫌行賄之指控進行辯護。主張捐款予協會與應惠中個人無關，且相關協會均為真實存在並長期從事公益之組織；強調威京集團對款項用途不知情，且政治獻金屬長期支持而非單次行賄。針對應惠中部分，對比賴素吾案指出本案缺乏監聽、坦承或汙點證人等證據；針對吳順民部分，則主張其身分應為「顧問」而非「助理」，其領取之款項為提供不動產開發專業建議之合法報酬且有報稅紀錄。","video_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","raw_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/raw/chunk_0034.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/cleaned/chunk_0034.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0034","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0034/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0034/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0034/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/sO8SNz7mXis","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}