{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0036.txt","chunk_index":36,"documents_referenced":["司法院法學資料系統"],"end_seconds":10920,"keywords":["京華城案","司法不公","政治打擊","法律倫理","行收會","關鍵證據"],"legal_issues":["司法體系是否存在權勢不對等之不公","行賄罪（行收會）之證據認定標準","起訴之正當性與司法公平性"],"legal_issues_raw":["行賄罪（行收會）之證據認定標準","起訴之正當性與司法公平性","司法體系是否存在權勢不對等之不公"],"participants":["辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0036","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":10620,"summary":"辯護律師針對本案（京華城案）缺乏關鍵證據（如監聽紀錄、金流、汙點證人或被告坦承）之情況，對比林義士、賴樹、蘇正清、景天柏及鄭文燦等案件，質疑本案起訴之正當性。律師進一步抨擊司法體系長期存在的不公平現象，並質疑本案是否淪為權力者打擊政治對手的工具，呼籲法官應基於法律道德與良心進行審判。","video_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","raw_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/raw/chunk_0036.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/cleaned/chunk_0036.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0036","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0036/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0036/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0036/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/sO8SNz7mXis","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}