{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0037.txt","chunk_index":37,"documents_referenced":["傳證資料"],"end_seconds":11215,"keywords":["圖利罪","有利於被告原則","柯文哲","沈慶京","無罪判決","行賄"],"legal_issues":["共同圖利罪之成立與否","有利於被告原則之適用","羈押期間之正當性","行賄罪之成立與否"],"legal_issues_raw":["共同圖利罪之成立與否","行賄罪之成立與否","羈押期間之正當性","有利於被告原則之適用"],"participants":["徐律師","辯護律師","陳漢文"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","陳漢文（法官/法庭人員）","徐律師"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0037","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":10915,"summary":"辯護律師針對被告沈慶京進行最後辯論，強調其企業家精神與人格特質，質疑檢方羈押一年之正當性，並主張若證據不足以證明與柯文哲有圖利犯意或行賄事實，應依據有利於被告原則判決無罪。隨後法院詢問其他辯護人補充辯論之時間需求。","video_id":"sO8SNz7mXis","raw_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/raw/chunk_0037.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/sO8SNz7mXis/cleaned/chunk_0037.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0037","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0037/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0037/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/sO8SNz7mXis:chunk_0037/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/sO8SNz7mXis","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}