{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0001.txt","chunk_index":1,"documents_referenced":["起訴書"],"end_seconds":595,"keywords":["侵佔","偽造筆錄","公平正義","政治作戰","政治獻金","選擇性偵辦"],"legal_issues":["侵佔罪之認定 (涉及木可公司、網路媒體企劃案、KP秀票房收入)","政治獻金之法律性質 (爭議是否屬於個人或國家財產)","法律適用之平等原則 (質疑選擇性偵辦)","筆錄真實性與偵查程序之合法性 (指控偽造筆錄、疲勞轟炸)"],"legal_issues_raw":["筆錄真實性與偵查程序之合法性 (指控偽造筆錄、疲勞轟炸)","政治獻金之法律性質 (爭議是否屬於個人或國家財產)","侵佔罪之認定 (涉及木可公司、網路媒體企劃案、KP秀票房收入)","法律適用之平等原則 (質疑選擇性偵辦)"],"participants":["柯文哲","檢察官"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","檢察官 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0001","session_date":"2025-12-23","session_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":295,"summary":"被告柯文哲針對檢方之起訴內容進行辯護，指控檢察官偽造筆錄、採取疲勞偵訊、抹黑其與市府人員之關係，並質疑政治獻金案之起訴邏輯與法律適用不公。其強調檢方雖對其及家屬進行大規模搜查，卻未發現違法證據，並質疑檢方將政治獻金認定為國家財產之邏輯缺乏一致性，涉嫌政治迫害與選擇性偵查。","video_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","raw_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/raw/chunk_0001.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/cleaned/chunk_0001.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0001","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0001/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0001/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0001/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/xV6hqj2Ybds","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}