{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0002.txt","chunk_index":2,"documents_referenced":["Line 簡訊紀錄","媒體企劃案契約及企劃書","政治獻金專戶收據","監察院裁罰處分","邱顯生傳訊筆錄"],"end_seconds":890,"keywords":["公益侵佔","募可公司","政治獻金","文字獄","監察院","競選小物","選擇性適用"],"legal_issues":["商業投資與媒體企劃之認定爭議","政治獻金之公益侵佔指控","政治獻金剩餘款支付員工薪資之合法性","競選小物銷售所得是否應視為政治獻金","行政行為（都委會審議）之合法性認定"],"legal_issues_raw":["政治獻金之公益侵佔指控","商業投資與媒體企劃之認定爭議","政治獻金剩餘款支付員工薪資之合法性","競選小物銷售所得是否應視為政治獻金","行政行為（都委會審議）之合法性認定"],"participants":["地檢署","林慶榮","柯文哲","檢察官","監察院","邱顯生"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","檢察官（被提及）","邱顯生（被提及）","監察院（被提及）","地檢署（被提及）","林慶榮（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0002","session_date":"2025-12-23","session_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":590,"summary":"被告（柯文哲）針對其政治獻金案及相關指控進行辯護。他主張檢方將媒體企劃案誤認為商業投資、將合法支付員工薪資視為犯罪，並質疑檢方將競選小物銷售所得強行定義為政治獻金。他認為自己遭到政治迫害與選擇性執法，並對檢方在缺乏專業行政經驗的情況下，無視公務員證詞而認定違法表示不滿。","video_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","raw_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/raw/chunk_0002.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/cleaned/chunk_0002.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0002","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0002/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0002/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0002/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/xV6hqj2Ybds","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}