{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0008.txt","chunk_index":8,"documents_referenced":["檢察官論告書","起訴書（犯罪事實欄）"],"end_seconds":2660,"keywords":["公益侵佔","政治獻金","易持有為所有","木可公司","背信"],"legal_issues":["政治獻金是否屬於刑法侵佔罪定義之「他人之物」","被告之行為是否構成「易持有為所有」之侵佔主觀意圖","資金進入木可公司是否等同於被告個人侵佔"],"legal_issues_raw":["政治獻金是否屬於刑法侵佔罪定義之「他人之物」","被告之行為是否構成「易持有為所有」之侵佔主觀意圖","資金進入木可公司是否等同於被告個人侵佔"],"participants":["柯文哲","法官","陸正義律師（辯護人）"],"participants_raw":["法官","陸正義律師（辯護人）","柯文哲（被告）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0008","session_date":"2025-12-23","session_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2360,"summary":"本段逐字稿記錄了被告柯文哲之辯護人陸正義律師針對起訴書中涉嫌公益侵佔及背信之指控進行答辯。辯護人首先透過照片呈現柯文哲生活簡樸之形象，隨後針對檢方指控之多項侵佔金額（包含政治獻金、木可公司、周廣美文等款項）提出質疑，並就政治獻金是否屬於法律定義之「他人之物」以及是否構成「易持有為所有」之侵佔行為提出法律爭點，質疑檢方邏輯之矛盾。","video_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","raw_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/raw/chunk_0008.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/cleaned/chunk_0008.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0008","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0008/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0008/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0008/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/xV6hqj2Ybds","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}