{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0010.txt","chunk_index":10,"documents_referenced":["刑法（侵佔罪相關規定）","政治獻金法（第30條）","最高行政法院判決","起訴書"],"end_seconds":3250,"keywords":["他人之物","侵佔罪","政治獻金","政治獻金法","最高行政法院","木可公司","行政罰"],"legal_issues":["政治獻金之所有權歸屬（捐款人、國家或受贈人）","政治獻金之法律性質是否屬於刑法侵佔罪之「他人之物」","政治獻金使用違規是否僅限於行政法處罰（政治獻金法第30條）而非刑事犯罪"],"legal_issues_raw":["政治獻金之法律性質是否屬於刑法侵佔罪之「他人之物」","政治獻金使用違規是否僅限於行政法處罰（政治獻金法第30條）而非刑事犯罪","政治獻金之所有權歸屬（捐款人、國家或受贈人）"],"participants":["柯文哲","梁舊局","檢察官","辯方律師（發言者）"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師（發言者）","柯文哲（被告/提及者）","檢察官（提及者）","梁舊局（提及者）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0010","session_date":"2025-12-23","session_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2950,"summary":"辯方針對柯文哲涉嫌侵佔政治獻金之指控進行辯護。主張根據最高行政法院之見解，政治獻金一旦匯入專戶即成立贈與，屬受贈人（參選人或政黨）所有，不屬於刑法侵佔罪定義之「他人之物」。辯方強調政治獻金之使用若有違規，僅涉及《政治獻金法》之行政裁罰，不構成刑事犯罪，且款項均用於選舉與政黨運作，並無私用，因此認為侵佔罪之前提不成立，應予不起訴。","video_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","raw_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/raw/chunk_0010.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/cleaned/chunk_0010.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0010","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0010/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0010/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0010/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/xV6hqj2Ybds","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}