{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0017.txt","chunk_index":17,"documents_referenced":["木可公司出資結構紀錄","木可公司與復存、瑞果公司之授權合約","李文宗偵訊筆錄","起訴書","邱佩玲偵訊筆錄"],"end_seconds":5315,"keywords":["侵佔罪","政治獻金","木可公司","構成要件","肖像權授權","舉證責任"],"legal_issues":["侵佔罪之構成要件（是否具備「以持有為所有」之事實）","政治獻金是否被透過肖像權授權金名義非法侵佔"],"legal_issues_raw":["侵佔罪之構成要件（是否具備「以持有為所有」之事實）","政治獻金是否被透過肖像權授權金名義非法侵佔"],"participants":["周俊吉","李文宗","林明群","林耀宗","柯文哲","辯方律師","邱佩玲"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師","柯文哲","邱佩玲","李文宗","林耀宗","周俊吉","林明群"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0017","session_date":"2025-12-23","session_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":5015,"summary":"辯方針對柯文哲涉嫌侵佔之兩大爭點進行辯護：首先，關於周俊吉與林明群的捐款，主張證人邱佩玲無法確認款項是否交至柯文哲手中，檢方缺乏舉證，不符侵佔罪「以持有為所有」之構成要件；其次，針對木可公司肖像權授權金涉嫌侵佔政治獻金之指控，辯方引用李文宗之證詞，主張木可公司成立之初即為授權肖像權予復存及瑞果公司銷售周邊商品，與選舉或侵佔政治獻金無關。","video_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","raw_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/raw/chunk_0017.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/cleaned/chunk_0017.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0017","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0017/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0017/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0017/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/xV6hqj2Ybds","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}