{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0020.txt","chunk_index":20,"documents_referenced":["募可公司與凡帝公司之商品合約書","廠商對照表（包含凡帝公司、蒂頂公司、美琪公司）","核心小組會議記錄","起訴書"],"end_seconds":6200,"keywords":["募可公司","募款換小物","商業販售","對價關係","政治獻金","金流所有權"],"legal_issues":["募款與商業販售之法律性質區分","商品對價之合理性（是否構成不相當對價）","政治獻金專戶之存放義務","資金所有權之歸屬（募可公司 vs 柯文哲）"],"legal_issues_raw":["募款與商業販售之法律性質區分","政治獻金專戶之存放義務","商品對價之合理性（是否構成不相當對價）","資金所有權之歸屬（募可公司 vs 柯文哲）"],"participants":["孫丁君","李文娟","李文宗","柯文哲","靜總"],"participants_raw":["李文宗","柯文哲","李文娟","孫丁君","靜總"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0020","session_date":"2025-12-23","session_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":5900,"summary":"本段內容主要在論證「募款換小物」與「募可公司販售小物」在法律本質與操作上的差異。重點在於說明李文宗受核心小組會議指派，獨立負責募可公司的商品設計、廠商接洽及金流管理。透過對比一、二波募款與第三波募可販售之廠商、商品樣式、價差倍數（募款4-9倍 vs 販售2-3倍）以及會計處理（收據 vs 發票），主張募可公司的行為屬於一般商業販售，其收入所有權歸屬於募可公司，與柯文哲無關，且並非政治獻金之違法挪用。","video_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","raw_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/raw/chunk_0020.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/cleaned/chunk_0020.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0020","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0020/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0020/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0020/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/xV6hqj2Ybds","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}