{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0021.txt","chunk_index":21,"documents_referenced":["《政治獻金法》第二條第一項","孫丁君筆錄","檢方起訴書/卷證資料"],"end_seconds":6495,"keywords":["KP秀","侵佔","其他經濟利益","彩豐公司","政治獻金","政治獻金專戶","木可公司"],"legal_issues":["KP秀門票收益是否屬於政治獻金之法律定義","是否構成侵佔罪（缺乏持有意圖與知情證據）","款項性質認定：屬於「政治獻金」或《政治獻金法》之「其他經濟利益」"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否構成侵佔罪（缺乏持有意圖與知情證據）","款項性質認定：屬於「政治獻金」或《政治獻金法》之「其他經濟利益」","KP秀門票收益是否屬於政治獻金之法律定義"],"participants":["孫丁君（彩豐公司負責人）","李文娟","柯文哲","檢方","辯護人","黃珊珊"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","孫丁君（彩豐公司負責人）","黃珊珊","李文娟","檢方","辯護人"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0021","session_date":"2025-12-23","session_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":6195,"summary":"辯護方針對檢方指控柯文哲涉嫌侵佔彩豐公司三百萬元及KP秀門票收益之案件進行辯論。辯方主張柯文哲對彩豐公司匯款至木可公司一事完全不知情，且該筆款項性質應為《政治獻金法》中的「其他經濟利益」（贊助宣傳廣告），而非應匯入專戶的政治獻金。此外，辯方質疑檢方在缺乏證據證明柯文哲持有或知情的情況下仍提起起訴，並針對KP秀門票收入是否屬於政治獻金提出法律爭議。","video_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","raw_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/raw/chunk_0021.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/cleaned/chunk_0021.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0021","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0021/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0021/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0021/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/xV6hqj2Ybds","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}