{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0024.txt","chunk_index":24,"documents_referenced":["起訴書"],"end_seconds":7380,"keywords":["K秀","不相當之給付","對價關係","成本售價比","政治獻金"],"legal_issues":["K 秀之性質認定（商業演出 vs 政治募款）","認定政治獻金之「對價不相當」標準（主觀認定 vs 客觀成本分析）"],"legal_issues_raw":["認定政治獻金之「對價不相當」標準（主觀認定 vs 客觀成本分析）","K 秀之性質認定（商業演出 vs 政治募款）"],"participants":["辯方律師/代理人"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師/代理人"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0024","session_date":"2025-12-23","session_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":7080,"summary":"辯方針對 K 秀（演唱會）之性質進行辯護，主張其應視為一般商業演出而非政治獻金。透過將 K 秀的成本售價比（約 85.5% 成本率）與蔡英文、賴清德之募款餐會（成本極低，售價極高）進行對比，證明 K 秀之對價關係相當，並批評檢方僅以主觀感受認定門票價格不相當，缺乏客觀數據支持。","video_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","raw_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/raw/chunk_0024.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/cleaned/chunk_0024.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0024","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0024/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0024/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0024/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/xV6hqj2Ybds","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}