{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0026.txt","chunk_index":26,"documents_referenced":["內政部函示","最高行政法院判決/見解","監察院見解","調查局職務報告","起訴書"],"end_seconds":7970,"keywords":["他人之物","代言人","公益侵佔","政治獻金","構成要件","眾望基金會"],"legal_issues":["使用政治獻金支付員工薪水之合法性","政治獻金剩餘款之所有權歸屬是否符合侵佔罪中「他人之物」之構成要件","柯文哲是否構成對眾望基金會之背信行為"],"legal_issues_raw":["柯文哲是否構成對眾望基金會之背信行為","政治獻金剩餘款之所有權歸屬是否符合侵佔罪中「他人之物」之構成要件","使用政治獻金支付員工薪水之合法性"],"participants":["周榆修","審判長","李文宗","林俊元","柯文哲","法官(合議庭)","辯護律師","鄭佑翰"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","審判長","法官(合議庭)","柯文哲(被告)","李文宗(證人/董事長兼執行長)","周榆修(證人/主任)","鄭佑翰(證人/專員)","林俊元(檢察官)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0026","session_date":"2025-12-23","session_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":7670,"summary":"辯護律師針對柯文哲被指控公益侵佔一案進行辯護。律師主張眾望基金會確實從事公益活動，且柯文哲僅擔任代言人角色，未參與基金會運作或受委任處理事務，不存在背信行為。此外，律師質疑檢方在起訴書中未能證明政治獻金屬於「他人之物」，且引用內政部、調查局及最高行政法院之見解，主張政治獻金所有權屬於受贈人，不構成侵佔罪。","video_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","raw_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/raw/chunk_0026.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/cleaned/chunk_0026.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0026","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0026/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0026/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0026/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/xV6hqj2Ybds","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}