{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0027.txt","chunk_index":27,"documents_referenced":["內政部函釋","最高行政法院判決","木可公司相關決議/合約","眾望基金會章程","肖像權授權書","起訴書"],"end_seconds":8265,"keywords":["KP秀","公益侵佔","對價關係","政治獻金","木可公司","眾望基金會","羅織罪名"],"legal_issues":["基金會章程執行與不法所有意圖之認定","政治獻金之授權歸屬法律認定","款項流向是否構成公益侵佔","肖像權授權金之知情與責任歸屬","門票收入是否構成政治獻金及對價關係認定"],"legal_issues_raw":["門票收入是否構成政治獻金及對價關係認定","款項流向是否構成公益侵佔","政治獻金之授權歸屬法律認定","肖像權授權金之知情與責任歸屬","基金會章程執行與不法所有意圖之認定"],"participants":["周玉蔻","李文宗","林國慶","柯文哲","梁秀局","檢察官","謝國良","辯方律師/","邱佩玲","邱富生"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師/發言人","柯文哲","檢察官","邱富生","李文宗","邱佩玲","梁秀局","謝國良","周玉蔻","林國慶"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0027","session_date":"2025-12-23","session_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":7965,"summary":"辯方針對柯文哲被起訴之公益侵佔及政治獻金爭議進行辯護。主張KP秀門票收入具有對價關係且非政治獻金，質疑檢方認定標準雙標；說明木可公司銷售小物之決議與執行由李文宗負責；針對邱佩玲轉交之款項質疑其捐款意圖與流程違背常理；強調柯文哲對眾望基金會運作及肖像權授權金並不知情，指責檢方刻意忽略證據與相關函釋，涉嫌羅織罪名。","video_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","raw_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/raw/chunk_0027.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/cleaned/chunk_0027.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0027","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0027/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0027/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0027/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/xV6hqj2Ybds","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}