{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0028.txt","chunk_index":28,"documents_referenced":["本案卷宗"],"end_seconds":8560,"keywords":["侵佔罪","偵查偏見","十二怒漢","合理懷疑","政治獻金","無罪推定"],"legal_issues":["侵佔罪之構成要件（是否具備不法所有意圖）","偵查程序之客觀性義務","政治獻金之定性與用途","無罪推定原則"],"legal_issues_raw":["侵佔罪之構成要件（是否具備不法所有意圖）","政治獻金之定性與用途","偵查程序之客觀性義務","無罪推定原則"],"participants":["公署","審判長","書記官","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["辯護人","審判長","公署檢察官","書記官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0028","session_date":"2025-12-23","session_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":8260,"summary":"辯方律師針對柯文哲涉嫌侵佔罪之案件進行最後陳詞，質疑檢方在偵查階段存在強烈偏見，採取「先射箭後畫靶」的作法，刻意忽略對被告有利的證據。辯方引用電影《十二怒漢》強調「合理懷疑」與「無罪推定」之重要性，呼籲司法應回歸客觀公正，而非受偏見影響而羅織罪名。","video_id":"xV6hqj2Ybds","raw_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/raw/chunk_0028.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/xV6hqj2Ybds/cleaned/chunk_0028.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0028","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0028/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0028/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/xV6hqj2Ybds:chunk_0028/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/xV6hqj2Ybds","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}